THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON Essays - Education, Free Essays

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON Essays - Education, Free Essays THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON Faculty for Business and Law MODULE: Negotiations across Cultures (Assignment 2 of 2 ) 201 8 Module Code Level Credit Value Module Tutor STRM060 - STD- 16 /17 7 20 Gwen Lee Assignment Brief Assignment title: Group presentatio n along the below lecture topic Duration: 15 minutes - plus or minus 1 minute professional presentation in groups of 3-6 students. Weighting: 40% Submission date / Presentation date: 23 July 2018 30 July for the presentations to commence. RESIT TBC once the first submission grades have been agreed. Usually after the module has finished to give students' time to prepare for the STRM060 assignment 2 and any other first sit modules they may also be talking. 1. Purpose of the Assessment The purpose of this assignment is to facilitate that students, in groups of 3-6, present in-depth a topic that has been covered in one of the Workshops. Furthermore, students will have the opportunity to discuss their personal and professional progression following the engagement with this module. While the first assignment specifically addresses a direct negotiation topic / question the second assignment allows for the exploration of a topic that the groups wish to academically explore further. There is a reflection and analysis element relating to each individual student. Assignment two seek to advance the recognition by students how the knowledge that stems from this module contributes to their personal and professional development. This self-discovery, and the subsequent implementation into daily practice is of considerable relevance as this will ensure the acquired knowledge and skills can unfold material and non-material benefits for the students as well as for the wider community. 2. Assessment t ask Type of Assessment The assignment is a group presentation with 3 - 6 group members. Requirements and components of the task The presentation is presenting an academically competent topic which links directly with a theme / topic relating to negotiating. Students, within their group, shall adequately address and discuss what they have academically researched and learned collectively in alignment with their group's chosen theme / topic. NB It is particularly important to link to established academic concepts, theories and models as this is a MBA Level 7 presentation / assessment. The final element is individual and each student should aim to demonstrate their own learning journey throughout the duration of this module covering what they have learned. This final element allows the articulate how students can implement the learning into their daily practice, both professionally and personally. Expected Format The presentation shall be recorded on-site with all group members present. Students are expected to equally distribute the work load and th e speaking time during their 15 presentation, plus or minus 1 minute, and 60 - 90 seconds for the individual self-reflection) . The presentations must be of excellent formatting standard i.e. professional. Information about content, structure, formatting and other expectations will be provided in the assignment briefing i n the corresponding workshop. A working baseline should be to keep it simple, avoid cartoon images, avoid having too many words on the slides, do not read from the screen, include quality academic Harvard style references with at least two per slide and it must be a professional MBA Level 7 academic presentation. Individual contribution and total time All group members must contribute equality in the allot presentation time. Assessment breakdown / guidance 1. Ability to display critical thinking relating towards the various topics around negotiating at the minimum requirements of MBA Level 7 quality or above? (using theory, concepts, examples explained, further elaborated on, confronted with another and possible contradicted? ( 30 %) 2. Quality of citations and referencing - MBA Level 7 quality - (stringency of references used, and formatted, Harvard Referencing) (25 %) - 3. How is the visual presentation of the presentation and adherence to formality (i.e. typos, formatting stringency, slide numbering, font sizes, general appearance, integration of media, etc.)? It needs to be professionally presented (15 %) - 4. Ability to conclude and to issue recommendations (is there a formal conclusion in the presentation in screen format and spoken format, that summarises the important learning, and are recommendations provided based on the content of the presentation at MBA Level